The Fair Representation Act would transform Florida’s congressional map from 28 single-winner districts into 6 multi-winner districts. Voters would elect representatives using proportional ranked choice voting.
Gerrymandering would be nearly eliminated, every election would be competitive, and Florida voters would have far more power than they do today.
With more choices in the general election and proportional outcomes, the Fair Representation Act will create more opportunities for urban Republicans, rural Democrats, independents, women, and people of color.
Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest information on election reform, or get involved in your community.
Improved Partisan Representation
Proportional RCV elects members of each party reflecting that party’s vote share.
Florida’s statewide partisanship is 46% Democrat / 54% Republican. The Fair Representation Act would preserve the Republican majority but also award a fair number of seats to Democrats and most likely create an additional competitive “swing seat”.
Better Racial Representation
The Fair Representation Act increases the number of districts where communities of color have the power to elect a candidate of their choice, as measured by their share of the citizen voting age population.
In a district with 5 representatives, any candidate earning at least 17% of the vote wins a seat. In a district with 3 representatives, any candidate earning over 25% of votes wins a seat. These thresholds create the opportunity for more groups to have a seat at the table, compared to single-winner districts where candidates need a majority or near-majority to win a seat.
With the Fair Representation Act, Black voters are over the threshold to elect in two districts, and Latino voters are over the threshold for four seats across three districts, meaning both groups have the deciding power to elect candidates of their choice. Notably, Black voters do not have power-to-elect in any of the current single-member districts, meaning the FRA would give Black voters deciding power they were previously denied (despite making up 15% of the population). The “power-to-elect” threshold represents a floor for representation, not a ceiling: candidates of color are most likely to succeed in these districts, but may also be elected in other districts.
An additional five districts include a “coalition seat,” or a seat where no individual racial or ethnic group is over the threshold on its own. These seats provide opportunities for coalition-building candidates.
An End to Gerrymandering
Under the Fair Representation Act, the ability to gerrymander for partisan advantage would be drastically reduced. With fewer lines to draw and proportional representation in every district, the redistricting process becomes more fair and the possibility for gerrymandering is nearly eliminated.
More Competitive Elections
With larger geographic districts, it is harder to draw districts in ways that pack partisans together. What’s more, the Fair Representation Act’s criteria for district-drawing encourages fair partisan representation.
Eliminating “winner-take-all” rules will encourage both Republicans and Democrats to compete for votes in every district. Every multi-winner district in Florida would be likely to elect at least one member of each major party.
Even in districts where one or more seats are considered “safe” for one party, candidates from that party will be competing against other members of their party, creating healthy competition both within and between parties.
When elections are competitive, representatives are accountable to voters and have a greater incentive to champion policies that have broad support.
A More Expressive Ballot
In proportional ranked choice voting, voters have the option to rank candidates in order of preference: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so forth. Voters are free to express their honest preferences without fear of “spoiler candidates” or “wasted votes”.
Learn more here about how ranked choice in multi-winner districts improves our elections.
