CVD homepage
What's new?
Online library
Order materials
Get involved!
Links
About CVD

Choice Voting in Cambridge, MA

June 2004

Introduction
To elect its 9-member City Council and 6-member School Committee, Cambridge, Massachusetts uses choice voting, also known as STV, the single transferable vote.  This voting system is a non-winner-takes-all method of full representation.  Cambridge holds the distinction of being the only jurisdiction in the United States that still uses a choice voting system.  Choice voting in Cambridge has survived legal challenges, most recently in 1996. The Supreme Court of Massachusetts deemed choice voting to be constitutionally valid. There have also been 5 failed referenda to repeal choice voting.

Cambridge, MA adopted proportional voting in 1941, in an effort to increase African-American representation in local government.  Since its inception, the African American community of Cambridge have been able to elect representatives to both bodies in almost every election in the 1960’Äôs and 1970’Äôs ’Äì with between 5-10% of the total population.  
 
Elements of Choice Voting
In a choice system, the voter ranks the candidates in their order of preference.  Voters simply rank candidates in order of preference, putting a "1" by their first choice, a "2" by their second choice and so on. Voters can rank as few or as many candidates as they wish, knowing that a lower choice will never count against the chances of a higher choice.

To determine winners, the number of votes necessary for a candidate to earn office is established based on a formula using the numbers of seats and ballots: one more than 1/(# of seats + 1).  This amount is termed the threshold of votes necessary for election.

 
Benefits of Choice Voting in Cambridge
The use of choice voting in Cambridge, MA has enabled minorities to better succeed in local elections by lowering the threshold for election.  Choice voting only requires that a minority population is at least 10% of the total population in order to guarantee a City Council seat or 14% for a school committee seat.  Under a typical winner-take-all system, a 51% white-majority can dominate all nine seats of the council or all six seats of the committee.  
 
Since 1980, when the African-American population crossed 10% of the population, the amount needed to guarantee a council representative, members of the African-American community have been consistently elected to the city council and school committee.  Also, as a result of choice voting and its promotion of coalition-building, although only 10% of the population, in recent years African-Americans have been able to hold more than one seat on each board at time.
 
The implementation of choice voting has also allowed women to achieve much greater representation in Cambridge than in other methods of election. Between 1997 and 2001, the City Council and School Committee had female representation between 1/3 and 2/3 of each body.
 
Contrary to what some critics speculate, choice voting is not too complicated for voters.  In Cambridge, the elections have an average of 2% error rate.  This figure includes both incorrectly marked ballots and blank ballots where the voter may have only participated in a higher level election.  In the future, to further reduce this error rate, Cambridge could allow error correction for the voters.    
 
 

Other information on choice voting in Cambridge:

Sample ballots from the Cambridge school board and city council elections. 

The history of Cambridge elections including election results, ballot analysis, and campaign finance information

Issues facing Cambridge and proportional representation

A further analysis of race in the Cambridge elections using choice voting 

Exploration of PR-STV on the City of Cambridge website

An article comparing preference voting to cumulative voting

An article highlighting the benefits of choice voting in Cambridge, Mass., featuring CVD's general counsel, Dan Johnson-Weinberger. 

 General commentary and other information on proportional voting:

Comparison of proportional voting to other voting methods

Introduction to choice voting, or PR-STV

Strengths of choice voting

Model of an election using choice voting

Summaries of 1993 PR Elections

 


top of page


______________________________________________________________________
Copyright 2002     The Center for Voting and Democracy
6930 Carroll Ave. Suite 610, Takoma Park, MD 20912
(301) 270-4616        info@fairvote.org